We raised $20M to help AI hire more humans.
Learn More
Insights
7 minutes read

15 Best HireVue Alternatives for 2025: Features, Pricing, Pros & Cons — Why Alex.com Leads

October 15, 2025
15 Best HireVue Alternatives for 2025: Features, Pricing, Pros & Cons — Why Alex.com Leads

Your recruiters spend a big chunk of their time on administrative tasks, letting qualified candidates slip through the cracks. HireVue promised to help with on-demand video interviews and AI assessments, but its $35K+ annual cost raises questions about ROI. While powerful, the platform can be complex and expensive for many teams.

Many recruiting leaders are now exploring leaner alternatives with flat-rate pricing, tighter ATS integrations, fraud detection, and better candidate experiences. Competitors offer monthly plans and no-login interview links that boost completion rates, which allows small and mid-sized teams to experiment without a huge financial commitment.

This guide reviews 15 HireVue alternatives for 2025. You’ll see key features, pricing, and pros and cons. It’ll help you choose a platform that fits your workflow, budget, and recruiting goals.

1. Alex: Best for Autonomous AI-Powered Recruitment

Alex automates the recruiting process by conducting real conversational interviews, scoring answers against competency rubrics, and advancing qualified candidates automatically. The platform handles 5,000+ interviews daily, with nearly half happening after hours, to enable recruiters to focus on relationships instead of admin tasks.

Built-in ATS integrations enable bi-directional sync and custom field mapping, so Alex’s structured score tracking connects directly with your existing tech stack.

Key Features

  • Real conversational interviews, not one-way video
  • Standardized scoring against competency rubrics for easy ATS integration
  • 48% of interviews conducted outside working hours
  • Third-party bias audit validates fair evaluation across demographics
  • Fraud detection for off-screen prompts and AI-assisted responses
  • Support for 26+ languages
  • Enterprise-scale interview automation

Pricing: Custom pricing negotiated based on usage.

Pros

  • Automates interviewing and candidate scoring end-to-end
  • Reduces recruiter administrative workload significantly
  • 92% five-star candidate rating
  • Handles enterprise-scale volumes

Cons

  • Requires investment in setup and workflow alignment
  • Not ideal for small or mid-sized businesses with occasional screening needs

2. Spark Hire: Best for User-Friendly Video Interviews

Spark Hire simplifies structured video interviews with one-way and live sessions in a single dashboard. Standardized scorecards prevent inconsistencies across interviewers, while analytics track completion rates and time-to-hire. Role-based permissions secure sensitive data, and recordings push directly to Salesforce, Slack, or HubSpot.

Key Features

  • One-way and live video interviews
  • Standardized scorecards and structured feedback
  • Role-based permissions
  • Integration with Salesforce, Slack, HubSpot
  • Built-in analytics for completion rates and time-to-hire

Pricing: Starting at $149/month.

Pros

  • Simple, intuitive interface
  • Fast onboarding for recruiters
  • Reliable video screening with branding options

Cons

  • Limited AI interview capabilities
  • Feature depth may overwhelm teams needing basic tools
  • Occasional integration hiccups

3. VidCruiter: Best for Comprehensive HR Automation

VidCruiter centralizes scheduling, reference checks, and interview tracking in one workflow. Candidates select slots, recordings upload automatically, and structured scoring flows to your ATS. Integrations with Workday, ADP, Lever, Greenhouse, Salesforce, and SAP reduce manual work.

Key Features

  • Live and on-demand video interviews
  • Role-specific video templates and scoring rubrics
  • Automated feedback to ATS
  • Real-time dashboards for tracking
  • Compliance features for regulated industries

Pricing: Custom pricing.

Pros

  • End-to-end workflow automation
  • Reduces coordination time and manual entry
  • Scales for high-volume hiring

Cons

  • Requires technical setup
  • Feature depth may overwhelm smaller teams
  • Higher annual cost than basic scheduling tools

4. MyInterview: Best for AI-Powered Candidate Insights

MyInterview automates video and audio interviews, transcribes responses, and ranks candidates using AI based on tone, keywords, and delivery. SMS invites and personalized intros improve completion rates, and Zapier or webhooks integrate interviews into existing tools.

Key Features

  • Video/audio interviews with AI scoring
  • Automatic transcription and searchable responses
  • Multi-language support
  • Zapier/webhook integrations
  • Candidate ranking against role requirements

Pricing: Paid plans start at $19/month.

Pros

  • Quick setup, candidate-friendly
  • Converts manual scoring into actionable shortlists
  • Multi-language support

Cons

  • Limited branding options
  • Advanced analytics locked behind higher tiers
  • Occasional support delays

5. Hireflix: Best for Asynchronous One-Way Interviews

Hireflix focuses solely on asynchronous one-way interviews, removing scheduling conflicts while keeping completion rates high. Unlimited positions, reviewers, and interviews are included in each tier.

Key Features

  • Asynchronous video interviews only
  • Unlimited positions and reviewers
  • Simple interface with minimal setup

Pricing

  • <50 employees: $75/month
  • 50–250 employees: $150/month (annual billing)

Pros

  • Eliminates scheduling conflicts
  • Predictable, transparent pricing
  • Fast setup and easy adoption

Cons

  • No live interview capability
  • Basic analytics and limited customization

6. Hirevire: Best for Multi-Format Candidate Assessment

Hirevire lets candidates respond via video, audio, text, or file uploads in one workflow. Responses appear side-by-side for easy review, with API/ATS integrations and workflow automation via Zapier.

Key Features

  • Video, audio, text, and file upload responses
  • Role-specific questions with branding
  • Side-by-side bulk review
  • ATS integrations and workflow automation

Pricing: $39–$299/month.

Pros

  • Flexible, cost-effective screening
  • Streamlines scheduling and review
  • No additional headcount required

Cons

  • Lacks enterprise AI analytics
  • Limited compliance dashboards

7. Willo: Best for Global Recruitment Compliance

Willo ensures GDPR-ready candidate screening across time zones. Candidates record responses on their own schedule, and teams can review from a unified dashboard. Greenhouse integration is native; Workable via Zapier.

Key Features

  • GDPR-compliant infrastructure
  • Branded question sets and shareable links
  • Unified cloud dashboard
  • ATS integrations (Greenhouse, Workable via Zapier)

Pricing: Pay-as-you-go per interview, starting at $233/month (billed annually).

Pros

  • Predictable cost per hire
  • Scales for global hiring
  • Easy to deploy and review candidates

Cons

  • Limited analytics
  • No live interview capability

8. ScaleTwice: Best for High-Volume Candidate Evaluation

ScaleTwice handles large applicant pools with asynchronous interviews, side-by-side review, and consensus scoring. Bulk management tools reduce hours of admin per requisition.

Key Features

  • Asynchronous video interviews
  • Collaborative scoring and consensus workflow
  • Bulk management tools

Pricing: Custom subscription pricing.

Pros

  • Efficient high-volume screening
  • Cuts administrative workload
  • Standardized interview scripts

Cons

  • Light AI insights
  • Separate tool needed for live technical interviews

9. Jobma: Best for Global Enterprise Recruitment

Jobma combines live and on-demand interviews with AI transcription, multi-language support, and a global delivery network. ATS integrations include Greenhouse and iCIMS.

Key Features

  • Live and on-demand interviews
  • AI transcription
  • Multi-language interface
  • Global delivery network
  • ATS integrations

Pricing: Custom pricing.

Pros

  • Handles global hiring efficiently
  • Enterprise analytics for large teams
  • Multi-language support

Cons

  • Costs increase with heavy use
  • Advanced AI modules require setup
  • Implementation can overwhelm small teams

10. BarRaiser: Best for AI-Powered Interview Analytics

BarRaiser scores interviews automatically, flags speaking time dominance, and maps responses to competencies. Panel interviews produce highlight reels for easy stakeholder review.

Key Features

  • AI scoring for structured interviews
  • Panel management and scheduling
  • Shareable highlight reels

Pricing: Custom pricing based on interview volume.

Pros

  • Objective, data-driven hiring decisions
  • Reduces bias in interview evaluations
  • Consolidates interview feedback

Cons

  • Limited integrations
  • Learning curve for intuition-based teams

11. Vervoe: Best for Skills-Based Assessment

Vervoe auto-ranks candidates based on role-specific skills tests and video responses so you can prioritize proven talent over resumes. The platform delivers consistent, bias-free evaluation through standardized scoring.

Key Features

  • Role-specific skill and video tests
  • Automated candidate ranking
  • Branded assessments and analytics

Pricing: Custom pricing.

Pros

  • Prioritizes demonstrated ability over claims
  • Reduces resume screening time
  • Easy to customize for any role

Cons

  • AI logic behind rankings not transparent
  • Separate tool required for live interviews

12. TestGorilla: Best for Comprehensive Skill Testing

TestGorilla combines skill-based testing with short video questions to give recruiters validated insights. Anti-cheating tools and ATS integrations make high-volume screening simple and reliable.

Key Features

  • Timed, proctored tests and video questions
  • Anti-cheating and candidate tracking
  • Ranked dashboards with top performer insights

Pricing: Starts at $142/month (billed annually), with predictive analytics for higher-tier plans.

Pros

  • Cheat-proof assessments
  • Integrates with popular ATS platforms
  • Ideal for technical and cognitive testing

Cons

  • Advanced analytics in higher tiers
  • Limited flexibility in test customization

13. Xobin: Best for Technical Screening

Xobin merges coding tests, aptitude assessments, and live interviews to evaluate engineering candidates accurately. Built-in proctoring ensures secure, reliable testing at scale.

Key Features

  • AI-proctored coding and aptitude tests
  • Browser lockdown and screen tracking
  • Collaborative evaluation and ATS sync

Pricing: Subscription or custom contracts starting at $699.

Pros

  • Validated, cheat-proof coding tests
  • Strong ATS integration
  • Simplifies campus and tech hiring

Cons

  • Deep feature set may overwhelm non-technical users
  • Custom reports in premium tiers only

14. Phenom: Best for End-to-End Talent Experience

Phenom unifies the hiring journey into one platform. With built-in analytics and ATS integrations, it’s designed for enterprise visibility and consistency.

Key Features

  • Career site, referrals, video, and onboarding
  • Data-rich hiring funnel analytics
  • Integrations with Workday, SuccessFactors, and others

Pricing: Custom enterprise pricing.

Pros

  • Eliminates need for multiple tools
  • Centralized analytics and visibility
  • Deep integration with HR systems

Cons

  • Long implementation cycle
  • Costly for smaller teams

15. Sapia: Best for Bias Mitigation and Diversity

Sapia uses conversational AI chat interviews to evaluate candidates objectively and remove visual or auditory bias. Its behavioral analytics support measurable DE&I progress.

Key Features

  • AI-driven conversational chat interviews
  • Behavioral and sentiment analysis
  • DE&I dashboards for diversity tracking

Pricing: Scales by assessment volume or enterprise contracts.

Pros

  • Reduces unconscious bias
  • Fast, objective shortlisting
  • DE&I insights for leadership reporting

Cons

  • No video interview functionality
  • Limited ATS integrations

Comparison Table of Top HireVue Alternatives for 2025

Here’s a quick table comparing the different HireVue alternatives.

Platform Free plan or trial available Pricing model Main benefits
Alex No Annual contract Bias-free, high-volume enterprise hiring
Spark Hire No Subscription tiers User-friendly live and one-way video
VidCruiter No Annual license Deep HR automation
MyInterview Yes Subscription only AI insights available
Hireflix Yes (1-month free trial) Flat-rate sub Unlimited one-way interviews
Hirevire No Subscription tiers Multi-format responses
Willo Yes (PAYG) Pay-as-you-go Compliance-first with global reach
ScaleTwice No Custom quote High-volume screening
Jobma No Subscription (monthly or yearly) Live and on-demand video
BarRaiser No Custom AI interview analytics
TestGorilla No Credits-based subscription Skills tests and video interviews
Vervoe No Subscription Skills-first hiring
Xobin No Subscription Proctored tech assessments
Phenom No Enterprise license End-to-end talent suite
Sapia No Volume-based Bias-mitigating chat interviews

Why Alex Stands Out Among HireVue Alternatives

Most platforms on this list automate parts of the hiring process. Alex automates the entire workflow. From AI-led interviews that adapt in real time to multilingual support and seamless ATS integrations, Alex acts as your AI recruiting partner to deliver faster decisions, unbiased evaluations, and higher candidate satisfaction.

Recruiters save hours each week, candidates move forward overnight, and hiring becomes scalable without expanding your team.

Book your personalized demo with Alex today and see how autonomous AI hiring can transform your recruitment efficiency.

Candidates love Alex

The way that she was speaking to me and the work that was put in to that was respectful. It made me feel encouraged.

Robyn F.
Creative Production Lead

Traditionally, you get to talk to a recruiter first, and they’re not experts on the subject matter.

Ace Y.
Senior Program Manager

One thing for sure that stood out: I really liked how it transcribed. It’s able to understand everything.

Neil S.
Business Analyst

Alex definitely would be a benefit to companies. It made me as a candidate more at ease.

Raymond T.
Technical Project Manager

I really liked being able to read what the questions are, especially when I’m nervous. I loved that.

Jillian L.
Sales Manager

There’s more capability in Alex than most recruiters or headhunters. She’s able to carry out more of a conversation based on specific things that I’m mentioning. That was really cool.

Chris G.
Senior Fintech PM

It was able to pick out the key points of what I was really trying to say. I think a recruiter would’ve disqualified me at that point. But, Alex made me feel good because Alex got to the heart of what I was saying.

Elizabeth L.
UX Researcher

Alex comfortably understood whatever I was saying in my Indian accent, and I’m also able to understand Alex. I think for all of the candidates who are coming from India, if Alex is interviewing them, it’ll be very comfortable for them.

Ritik K.
AML Analyst

Interview everyone.
Hire the best.

Book a demo