We raised $20M to help AI hire more humans.
Learn More
Insights
5 Minute Read

30 Illegal Interview Questions (and Legal Alternatives)

October 24, 2025
30 Illegal Interview Questions (and Legal Alternatives)

One prohibited interview question can trigger an investigation by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. According to EEOC data, discrimination penalties can reach up to $300,000 per individual for large employers, excluding legal fees and reputational damage.

Your recruiting team conducts hundreds of interviews annually. Each conversation without standardized questions creates compliance exposure. The risk multiplies when hiring managers improvise questions, putting your organization at risk of costly investigations and settlements.

This guide covers 30 common prohibited interview questions, compliant alternatives that legally gather necessary information, and a framework for eliminating risk through structured interviews.

What Makes Interview Questions Illegal

Federal law restricts interview questions that reveal protected class information under Title VII, the ADA, the ADEA, or GINA. The EEOC evaluates whether questions are job-related and could enable discrimination based on age, race, color, national origin, religion, disability, pregnancy, sex, or genetic information.

Questions become problematic when they surface protected details that influence hiring decisions. Once you know a candidate's age, religion, or family status, proving that those facts didn't affect your decision becomes difficult during an investigation.

Inconsistent interviewer training creates compliance gaps. When one manager asks about a candidate's graduation year while another focuses solely on skills, you're defending discriminatory screening practices. Structured interviews with standardized questions eliminate guesswork and the legal exposure that comes with inconsistent interviewing practices.

30 Illegal Interview Questions with Legal Alternatives

Structured interview scripts prevent compliance disasters. The 30 questions below represent the most common violations that trip up hiring managers, serving as your audit checklist to replace every risky inquiry with a job-related alternative.

Age Discrimination (ADEA)

The Age Discrimination in Employment Act protects workers 40 and older. Questions that reveal a person's birth year create litigation risk.

1. "How old are you?"

  • Why it's prohibited: Direct age inquiry suggesting age-based screening
  • Ask instead: "Are you at least 18 years old?" (only when legally required)

2. "What year were you born?"

  • Why it's prohibited: Allows age calculation with the same discrimination risk
  • Ask instead: "Can you provide proof of eligibility to work?" (verified after conditional offer)

3. "When did you graduate high school?"

  • Why it's prohibited: Reveals age indirectly through graduation year
  • Ask instead: "Do you have the required educational qualifications for this role?"

National Origin & Citizenship (Title VII)

Title VII prohibits national origin discrimination. Focus questions on work authorization, not ancestry or birthplace.

4. "Where were you born?"

  • Why it's prohibited: Reveals national origin directly
  • Ask instead: "Are you authorized to work in the United States?"

5. "Are you a U.S. citizen?"

  • Why it's prohibited: Citizenship questions can discriminate against legal residents.
  • Ask instead: "Are you legally authorized to work here without sponsorship?" (only if sponsorship is unavailable)

6. "What is your native language?"

  • Why it's prohibited: Reveals national origin through language background
  • Ask instead: "What languages do you speak fluently?" (only when language skills are job requirements)

7. "What accent is that?"

  • Why it's prohibited: Direct national origin inquiry
  • Ask instead: "This role requires frequent client presentations. Can you communicate effectively in those settings?"

Religious Accommodation (Title VII)

Religion questions often emerge from casual conversation, but create liability. Keep focus on scheduling requirements without probing beliefs.

8. "What is your religion?"

  • Why it's prohibited: Direct religious inquiry violates Title VII
  • Ask instead: "Are you able to work the required schedule?"

9. "What religious holidays do you observe?"

  • Why it's prohibited: Reveals religion through practice
  • Ask instead: "This role requires availability on weekends and holidays. Can you meet that requirement?"

10. "Do you attend church regularly?"

  • Why it's prohibited: Religious practice inquiry
  • Ask instead: "Are you available for occasional evening or weekend work?"

Marital & Family Status (Title VII)

Family questions feel like small talk, but expose gender and pregnancy bias concerns.

11. "Are you married?"

Why it's prohibited: Marital status discrimination

Ask instead: "Are you able to travel or work overtime as required?"

12. "Do you have children?"

  • Why it's prohibited: Family status discrimination
  • Ask instead: "Can you meet the attendance and schedule requirements?"

13. "Do you plan to have children?"

  • Why it's prohibited: Pregnancy discrimination
  • Ask instead: "Are you able to commit to the standard work schedule?"

14. "Who will take care of your children while you work?"

  • Why it's prohibited: Family status and gender discrimination
  • Ask instead: "Do you have any commitments that would prevent you from fulfilling job requirements?"

15. "Are you pregnant?"

  • Why it's prohibited: Direct pregnancy discrimination
  • Ask instead: "Can you perform the essential functions of this job?" (disclose physical requirements only)

Disability (ADA)

Before making a conditional offer, you can only ask about job performance ability, not medical history.

16. "Do you have any disabilities?"

  • Why it's prohibited: Direct disability inquiry is prohibited pre-offer
  • Ask instead: "Can you perform the essential functions of this job with or without reasonable accommodation?"

17. "Have you ever filed for workers' compensation?"

  • Why it's prohibited: Reveals prior injury or disability
  • Ask instead: "Can you meet the physical requirements outlined in the job description?"

18. "What is your health history?"

  • Why it's prohibited: Medical inquiry is prohibited pre-offer
  • Ask instead: "Are you able to perform the job duties we've discussed?"

19. "Have you had any recent illnesses or operations?"

  • Why it's prohibited: Medical history inquiry
  • Ask instead: "This role requires lifting 50 pounds. Can you perform that function?"

20. "How many sick days did you take last year?"

  • Why it's prohibited: Reveals potential disability or health conditions
  • Ask instead: "This role requires regular attendance. Can you meet that requirement?"

Physical Characteristics (ADA, Title VII)

Height and weight questions create discrimination risk unless tied to documented job requirements.

21. "How tall are you?"

  • Why it's prohibited: Height requirements often discriminate unless job-related
  • Ask instead: "This role requires reaching items on shelves up to 8 feet. Can you perform that function?"

22. "How much do you weigh?"

  • Why it's prohibited: Weight requirements are rarely job-related
  • Ask instead: "Can you meet the physical demands outlined in the job description?"

Criminal History (Title VII, State Laws)

Many states ban arrest inquiries and restrict conviction questions to post-offer stages.

23. "Have you ever been arrested?"

  • Why it's prohibited: Arrests without convictions are not permitted in many states
  • Ask instead: "Have you been convicted of a crime that would affect your ability to perform this role?" (only after a conditional offer in many jurisdictions)

Financial Status

Credit and bankruptcy questions trigger FCRA requirements and can discriminate against economically disadvantaged candidates.

24. "Have you ever declared bankruptcy?"

  • Why it's prohibited: Financial status is irrelevant for most roles
  • Ask instead: "This role requires handling company funds. Can you meet our bonding requirements?" (only if directly job-related)

25. "Do you own or rent your home?"

  • Why it's prohibited: Economic status discrimination
  • Ask instead: "Are you willing to relocate if this position requires it?"

Personal Information

Names and memberships can reveal gender, religion, or political affiliation.

26. "What is your maiden name?"

  • Why it's prohibited: Reveals marital status
  • Ask instead: "Have you worked or studied under a different name?" (only for background check purposes)

27. "What clubs or social organizations do you belong to?"

  • Why it's prohibited: Can reveal religion, race, or political affiliation
  • Ask instead: "Are you a member of any professional organizations relevant to this field?"

28. "What is your sexual orientation?"

  • Why it's prohibited: Sexual orientation discrimination
  • Ask instead: Focus exclusively on job qualifications and experience

29. "What is your political affiliation?"

  • Why it's prohibited: Political beliefs are irrelevant and create bias
  • Ask instead: Focus on professional experience and skills

Lifestyle Choices

Questions about personal habits can reveal protected medical conditions or invite subjective judgments.

30. "Do you smoke or drink alcohol?"

  • Why it's prohibited: Personal lifestyle choice unless directly safety-related
  • Ask instead: "This workplace is smoke-free. Can you comply with that policy?"

Best Practices for Compliance

Structured interviews eliminate compliance risk by standardizing questions across all candidates for the same role. When every applicant answers identical job-related questions, you document fairness and prevent discriminatory screening patterns.

Train interviewers quarterly. Schedule 60-minute workshops every three months to review protected classes, discuss real-world mistakes, and practice redirecting conversations when candidates volunteer information you didn't request. 

Document job-relatedness. Tie every question to an essential function like lifting requirements, technical skills, or client management. If you can't connect a question to job performance, remove it. During EEOC investigations, this documentation proves your interviews focused solely on performance criteria.

Use interview scorecards. Rate responses against predefined rubrics instead of "gut feel" decisions. This creates audit trails you can present with confidence to legal teams, finance, or regulatory agencies, while removing subjective bias from hiring decisions.

Implement automated interviews. AI-driven platforms deliver pre-approved questions identically for every candidate, eliminating the risk of hiring managers going off-script. These systems provide searchable transcripts, time-stamped scoring, and complete audit trails while freeing recruiters to focus on relationship-building instead of policing conversations.

Legal Resources for Employers

Building compliance-first hiring requires reliable legal resources. Start with the EEOC Compliance Manual and its small-business portal, which details which questions trigger liability. Share these with every hiring manager to ensure a consistent understanding.

For pay, hours, and workplace safety issues, the U.S. Department of Labor publishes fact sheets translating complex regulations into actionable guidance. Bookmark these resources and distribute updates regularly.

Your state labor agency matters more than federal guidelines since state laws often exceed federal requirements. California's prohibited inquiries overview demonstrates how local regulations can be more restrictive than state regulations. Check your state's guidance to understand both federal and regional compliance requirements.

Schedule annual compliance audits with employment counsel specializing in hiring practices. These reviews catch policy gaps before they become EEOC charges, saving significant time and resources. Track regulatory changes quarterly rather than annually since state laws evolve faster than federal rules, especially around criminal history inquiries and salary questions.

Protect Your Organization with Structured Interviews using Alex

Inconsistent interviewing creates compliance vulnerabilities. When hiring managers ask different questions, each interview becomes a compliance risk that can trigger EEOC investigations and costly settlements.

Structured interviews solve this by standardizing conversations around identical, job-related questions and scoring criteria. Alex delivers those questions identically for every candidate, records everything, and auto-generates time-stamped audit trails for complete transparency.

The platform conducts 5,000+ interviews daily with zero prohibited questions. Candidates receive identical assessments regardless of the interview time, eliminating the "manager lottery" in which quality depends on which hiring manager they draw. Your team scores responses against competency benchmarks pulled from job descriptions, creating defensible decisions and faster consensus.

92% of candidates rate these AI-driven conversations five stars. They experience professional, standardized interviews rather than unpredictable human interactions that vary with the interviewer's mood and training retention.

Book a demo to see how structured interviews eliminate compliance risk while improving candidate experience.

Frequently Asked Questions About Illegal Interview Questions

Q: How should our recruiters handle situations where candidates volunteer protected information during interviews?

A: Train interviewers to politely redirect the conversation back to job qualifications without acknowledging the protected information. For example, if a candidate mentions their church, respond with "That's great. Let's discuss how your project management experience aligns with this role's requirements." 

Document in your interview notes that the candidate volunteered the information unprompted, and ensure your hiring decision focuses solely on job-related criteria documented in your scorecard.

Q: What are the most common illegal interview questions for 2024 and 2025?

A: The most common prohibited questions remain consistent: age-related inquiries (graduation year, retirement plans), family status questions (childcare arrangements, marriage plans), disability questions before conditional offers, national origin questions (birthplace, citizenship status), and religious accommodation questions disguised as scheduling inquiries. 

Newer compliance concerns include questions about salary history (banned in many states), cannabis use (protected in some jurisdictions), and social media handles that could reveal protected characteristics.

Q: How can we train hiring managers to avoid asking illegal questions during customer service and other high-volume interview processes?

A: Implement structured interview scripts with pre-approved questions for each role. Conduct quarterly 60-minute training sessions covering protected classes, real examples of prohibited questions, and practice scenarios for redirecting conversations. Provide quick-reference cards listing compliant alternatives to common questions. 

For high-volume hiring, consider standardized interview platforms that deliver identical questions to every candidate, eliminating the risk that managers will improvise prohibited questions during back-to-back interview sessions.

Candidates love Alex

The way that she was speaking to me and the work that was put in to that was respectful. It made me feel encouraged.

Robyn F.
Creative Production Lead

Traditionally, you get to talk to a recruiter first, and they’re not experts on the subject matter.

Ace Y.
Senior Program Manager

One thing for sure that stood out: I really liked how it transcribed. It’s able to understand everything.

Neil S.
Business Analyst

Alex definitely would be a benefit to companies. It made me as a candidate more at ease.

Raymond T.
Technical Project Manager

I really liked being able to read what the questions are, especially when I’m nervous. I loved that.

Jillian L.
Sales Manager

There’s more capability in Alex than most recruiters or headhunters. She’s able to carry out more of a conversation based on specific things that I’m mentioning. That was really cool.

Chris G.
Senior Fintech PM

It was able to pick out the key points of what I was really trying to say. I think a recruiter would’ve disqualified me at that point. But, Alex made me feel good because Alex got to the heart of what I was saying.

Elizabeth L.
UX Researcher

Alex comfortably understood whatever I was saying in my Indian accent, and I’m also able to understand Alex. I think for all of the candidates who are coming from India, if Alex is interviewing them, it’ll be very comfortable for them.

Ritik K.
AML Analyst

Interview everyone.
Hire the best.

Book a demo