12 Best Bullhorn Amplify Alternatives for Staffing Firms: Features & Pricing

Bullhorn Amplify is a common ATS for many staffing firms. But as teams scale, common friction points emerge, like how costs climb past $250/user/month, AI capabilities requiring third-party add-ons, and integration complexity that slows recruiters down.

This guide breaks down 12 alternatives across pricing, native AI capabilities, fraud detection, and staffing-specific features so you can evaluate what fits your operation. The right staffing platform reduces time-to-fill from 34 days to 21 days while doubling revenue growth likelihood through native AI capabilities.

Here's what you'll learn in this article:

• 12 verified Bullhorn alternatives with transparent pricing and staffing-specific capabilities
• How AI-native platforms deliver 2x revenue growth and 13-day time-to-fill advantages
• Critical fraud prevention and compliance features protecting placements and client trust
• Real-world cost structures for accurate budget planning

1. Loxo

Loxo provides an integrated Applicant Tracking System (ATS)/CRM with a proprietary database of 1.2 billion professional profiles.

Pricing: Basic tier starting at $119/user/month; Professional and Enterprise tiers require custom quotes.

Best For: Mid-market to enterprise agencies requiring integrated talent intelligence.

Key Features:

• Integrated database of 1.2 billion professionals with AI-powered search
• AI-powered candidate matching throughout recruiting lifecycle

Limitations:

• Entry pricing of $119/user/month may exceed smaller agency budgets
• Platform complexity requires 4-6 weeks onboarding for average recruiter

Bottom-Line vs. Bullhorn: Loxo delivers native talent intelligence and AI that Bullhorn requires third-party bolt-ons to achieve.

2. Alex

Alex’s AI Interviews is an AI recruiting platform that conducts live two-way voice or video interviews at scale. Operating across 26+ languages, AI Interviews completes 5,000+ daily conversations with 48% occurring after hours, delivering 100-point scoring and 92% candidate satisfaction.

Every interview is screened for integrity in real time. Verify flags AI-generated responses, detects proxy candidates, and confirms identity before results reach your team. Talent Match surfaces high-potential candidates already sitting in your ATS through natural language search, while Resume Screens scores every incoming application with transparent rationale so nothing gets overlooked.

Coordinator ties it all together by automating outreach, scheduling, and bi-directional syncing with staffing-specific ATS systems, including Bullhorn and Avionté. Requisitions flow in, and scores, transcripts, and fraud detection results write directly back to your system. Interview plans are customizable across IT, QSR, light industrial, healthcare, finance, sales, and early career verticals.

Pricing: Custom enterprise pricing based on interview volume and staffing firm size; not publicly disclosed.

Best For: Staffing agencies managing client relationships alongside candidate pipelines, recruiters handling dozens of requisitions simultaneously, and teams requiring bulk outreach capabilities.

Key Features:

• AI Interviews conducts 5,000+ conversations daily with 48% occurring outside business hours
• 92% candidate satisfaction rating demonstrating human-like conversation quality
• Verify provides real-time fraud detection including AI-generated response identification
• Coordinator provides bi-directional integration with Bullhorn and Avionté for ATS sync
• AI Interviews supports 26+ languages for multilingual candidate populations

Bottom-Line vs. Bullhorn: Alex doesn't just replace Bullhorn; it augments it. While Bullhorn organizes recruiter workflows, AI Interviews expands interview capacity through live two-way conversations. Firms using AI for faster placements are twice as likely to experience revenue growth. Bullhorn requires third-party AI supplementation for screening automation. Alex’s AI Interviews provides interviewing as core functionality, with bi-directional Bullhorn integration.

3. Zoho Recruit

Zoho Recruit serves small staffing agencies at $25/user/month (billed annually), a competitively low entry price among Bullhorn alternatives.

Pricing: Starts at $25/user/month (billed annually).

Best For: Small staffing agencies prioritizing cost efficiency.

Key Features:

• Native Facebook integration for social recruiting; no native (built-in) LinkedIn integration for job posting or candidate sourcing
• Background checks through Checkr and Accurate integrations
• 8,000+ app integrations via Zapier

Limitations:

• Limited advanced reporting capabilities versus enterprise platforms

Bottom-Line vs. Bullhorn: Zoho Recruit offers significantly lower entry-level pricing with faster implementation.

4. Vincere

Vincere serves executive search firms handling senior-level placements.

Pricing: Starts at £85/user/month (~$108 USD) with volume discounts available.

Best For: Executive search firms specializing in senior placements.

Key Features:

• Integrated ATS and CRM for managing multiple client relationships
• Multi-touch recruitment automation for long-cycle placements
• Job board distribution partnerships with major aggregators

Limitations:

• May feel too generalist for pure retained-search firms running complex C-suite mandates

Bottom-Line vs. Bullhorn: Vincere offers transparent per-user pricing starting at £85/user per month.

5. JobAdder

JobAdder serves recruitment agencies with advanced reporting capabilities.

Pricing: Custom enterprise pricing model; industry analyst sources document tiered pricing aligned with enterprise staffing firm requirements.

Best For: Mid-market agencies prioritizing data-driven decision-making.

Key Features:

• Broadbean partnership providing access to 7,000+ job boards
• Customizable "Build Your Own" reporting feature in JobAdder Analytics Advanced

Limitations:

• Complete lack of pricing transparency requires a custom quote
• Advanced analytics features require an additional license tier beyond the base platform

Bottom-Line vs. Bullhorn: JobAdder provides access to 7,000+ job boards through the Broadbean partnership and implements ISO 27001 security.

6. Recruiterflow

Recruiterflow targets modern staffing businesses, integrating with 8,000+ applications through Zapier.

Pricing: Not publicly disclosed; requires a custom quote.

Best For: Small to mid-market agencies comfortable with Zapier-dependent integrations.

Key Features:

• Integration with 8,000+ apps via Zapier connectivity
• Verified Indeed ATS partnership, enabling automated data transfer

Limitations:

• Zapier dependency introduces additional costs ($20-$600/month) and complexity
• Limited native integrations require maintaining Zapier automation workflows

Bottom-Line vs. Bullhorn: Recruiterflow offers broad integration flexibility through Zapier.

7. Crelate

Crelate combines ATS and CRM for small to mid-market agencies tracking candidates and clients.

Pricing: Not publicly disclosed; requires custom quote.

Best For: Small to mid-market agencies seeking a straightforward combined ATS/CRM.

Key Features:

• Integration with 8,000+ apps through Zapier connectivity
• Indeed ATS partnership for automated applicant data sync
• Unified candidate and client management interface

Limitations:

• Primarily Zapier-dependent integration strategy adds complexity

Bottom-Line vs. Bullhorn: Crelate offers a clean, easy-to-use interface for small to mid-market agencies.

8. Avionté

Avionté provides end-to-end staffing software covering the full employment lifecycle.

Pricing: Pricing is not publicly listed; marketplace estimates suggest per‑user pricing, and vendors typically provide quotes on request.

Best For: Enterprise staffing firms requiring integrated back-office functions.

Key Features:

• End-to-end staffing lifecycle coverage from sourcing through payroll
• Integrated back-office functions (scheduling, time, pay management)

Limitations:

• Pricing structure unclear creates budget planning challenges
• Platform complexity requires 3-6 months implementation for full deployment

Bottom-Line vs. Bullhorn: Avionté serves enterprise-level staffing firms with capabilities extending further into back-office operations.

9. Manatal

Manatal serves small to mid-market agencies with a combined ATS/CRM, emphasizing social media recruiting and AI recommendations.

Pricing: Not publicly disclosed; requires custom quote.

Best For: Agencies prioritizing social media sourcing and candidate discovery.

Key Features:

• AI-powered candidate recommendations and scoring
• Social media integration for modern sourcing strategies
• SOC 2 Type II certification

Limitations:

• Market positioning suggests smaller agency focus versus enterprise capabilities
• Limited reporting customization versus analytics-focused platforms

Bottom-Line vs. Bullhorn: Manatal provides native AI candidate scoring capabilities that Bullhorn requires third-party supplementation to achieve.

10. Top Echelon

Top Echelon positions itself as a recruiter-focused alternative with network recruiting capabilities designed specifically for recruitment agencies and recruiting networks.

Pricing: Not publicly disclosed; requires custom quote.

Best For: Recruiting agencies participating in recruiting networks and collaborative placement models.

Key Features:

• Network recruiting capabilities for collaborative placement models
• Combined ATS and CRM functionality for agency operations
• Split placement and network intelligence features

Limitations:

• Network recruiting focus creates niche positioning that may not suit all agencies

Bottom-Line vs. Bullhorn: Top Echelon serves network recruiting models that Bullhorn doesn't emphasize.

11. Workable

Workable provides all-in-one recruitment software including ATS, candidate sourcing tools, and interview scheduling features with applications in staffing contexts.

Pricing: Not publicly disclosed in detailed tiers; requires custom quote.

Best For: Organizations prioritizing documented operational security controls including SOC 2 Type II compliance support.

Key Features:

• 24/7/365 security monitoring with automated alerts
• OFCCP data gathering and reporting tools for federal contractor compliance

Limitations:

• Limited documentation of staffing agency-specific features versus corporate recruiting
• Platform designed primarily for corporate hiring teams may require workflow adaptation

Bottom-Line vs. Bullhorn: Workable provides superior public documentation of security operations and compliance capabilities.

12. Ceipal ATS

Ceipal ATS specializes in agencies managing contract or vendor-based placements, positioning itself for IT staffing and vendor management scenarios.

Pricing: Not publicly disclosed; requires custom quote.

Best For: IT staffing agencies managing contract placements and vendor-based placement models.

Key Features:

• Vendor management system (VMS) capabilities for contract/vendor-based placements
• Contract staffing and IT staffing specialization
• Multi-client scenario management with unified reporting

Limitations:

• VMS focus may include features unnecessary for direct-hire agencies

Bottom-Line vs. Bullhorn: Ceipal targets the contract staffing and vendor management niche where Bullhorn competes.

Scale Interview Capacity Without Hiring More Recruiters

When AI Interviews handles screening conversations, your recruiters focus exclusively on relationship-building and placement negotiations: the high-value activities that directly drive revenue growth.

Ready to see how AI interviewing fits your staffing workflow? Book a demo to explore how AI Interviews expands your screening capacity while integrating with your existing Bullhorn environment.

FAQ

Q: How long does it actually take to switch from Bullhorn to an alternative platform?

ATS transitions require 6-12 weeks covering data migration, customization, and training. The exact timeline depends on database size, custom field complexity, and how many integrations need reconfiguring. Most vendors provide a dedicated implementation manager to minimize disruption during the switchover.

Q: Why has fraud prevention become a primary platform selection criterion in 2024-2025?

HireRight's 2025 report shows 75% of organizations uncovered discrepancies, yet only 60% conduct identity checks. AI-generated resumes, deepfake interviews, and proxy applicants make platform-level fraud detection essential.

Q: Can AI recruiting platforms actually deliver 2x revenue growth, or is that marketing hype?

SIA/Bullhorn's GRID report shows firms using AI for faster placements have twice the likelihood of revenue gains. The advantage compounds when AI handles screening volume, freeing recruiters to focus on client relationships and closing placements rather than administrative tasks.

Q: How does Alex differ from one-way video screening tools?

One-way video tools record preset responses without adaptive follow-up. Alex's AI Interviews conducts live two-way conversations with adaptive questions and provides real-time identity verification through Alex's Verify. The 92% satisfaction rating (see testimonials) demonstrates human-like quality.

Q: What's the typical ROI timeline when implementing AI interviewing capabilities?

Most agencies see ROI within 30-60 days. Alex's AI Interviews expands capacity immediately without headcount increases, while Alex's Coordinator automates workflow orchestration across your existing systems. The combination of faster time-to-fill and increased recruiter productivity drives measurable placement growth within the first quarter.